Talk with filmmaker Bruce C. McKenna about Part Nine of "The Pacific"
FORUMS | Archive / Part Nine | Talk with filmmaker Bruce C. McKenna about Part Nine of "The Pacific"
| author | post | action |
|---|
Bruce C. McKenna
![]() NM United States 05/09/2010 |
Post your questions here for Part Nine of "The Pacific" after it airs Sunday, May 9th at 9:00pm, only on HBO. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
mhenry
NY United States 05/09/2010 updated: 05/09/2010 |
joe mazzello really grew into this role. I dont know who Rami Malek is but this kid made a career for himself now. What a performance. Everyone I know is talking about this characther. As someone who doesnt watch alot tv but is a film producer, I am hooked to this series just like bob. Do you hear any emmy talk for you guys? I think Rami would deserve a supporting nod but it will never happen. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
Bruce C. McKenna
![]() NM United States 05/09/2010 |
M -- Rami is fantastic. And why do you think we won't get an Emmy nod? I think he will. He deserves it. Joe is fantastic, too, and the two of them together were magic. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
LTS
05/09/2010 updated: 05/09/2010 |
Really don't have many words for this one, Bruce. Just a great job all around. I'm glad I have been cutting my reading of With the Old Breed short before watching the episodes. Read up to peleilu originally, stopped, read through peleilu then only after watching those episodes. Then stopped again, and will start up again and finish the rest up after next week. Wanted to keep the series as suspenseful as I could but since I knew the books were huge and would also fill in a lot of details, I didn't want to wait for the series to end before I started reading. Onto the episode, like I said above, really no words to describe how fantastic a job you guys did. I'm sure as I read along now I'll find things that could have been included but it won't matter; as is, the episode stands on it's own. (glad to see it was longer too!) Don't think I have any questions yet but maybe as I read through the book later in the week I may. Didn't watch the preview for next week (for the same reason as not reading ahead) but I'm looking forward to how it closes, I remember not expecting the close of BoB to be anything like what 'Points' actually ended up being so I imagine this last one will be similar in that I really don't know what to expect other than I know thanks to you I'll find out what happens to Morgan, and I'm sure both leckie and sledge's stories will have closure, at least for their lives in the pacific. Just wanted to get a post out there for now commending you on this episode, it had the same effect that 'Why we fight' had on me the first time I watched it. Knowing all I know about this theater, I wasn't sure how well you guys would capture that part and after watching this one, if not perfect, you captured it nearly perfectly. Well done. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
mhenry
NY United States 05/09/2010 |
The emmy's are a long way from now. I meant, I think you will win multiple awards for the series but i dont think rami will but I will tell you he has been phenominal and should walk away with every award for supporting actor. I dont understand why the ratings arent as strong as band of brothers. This is a great series. Rami and Joe have so much chemistry. Snafu is such a prick who seems to care about nothing yet as the series went on he really has taken to sledge as a friend. You can see he cares about Sledge and covets his friendship. I seen some negative write ups on joe but if you watch old footage of the real eugene sledge and sid phillips. Joe and Ashton were perfect choices. James Badge Dale is great too. Rami and Joe together was magicial for you guys. Jon Seda was the only person I was not crazy about out of the main stars but maybe being from the area and hearing abotu Basilone prior, I just dont see Jon as basilone. Jon did however come off as someone who has been in the military. He nailed acting like a marine. When I think of John Basilone I think of a bulky jarhead. Do you have any other projects coming out? Lastly, thank god for HBO the network has fabolous shows and mini-series. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
matt314159
05/10/2010 updated: 05/10/2010 |
Hello again, Bruce! First, my heartfelt thanks to you, HBO, and to all who had a hand in this series. Each episode in the 2nd half has really built in intensity and character development, and now, after seeing the penultimate installment, I'm filled with a bittersweet feeling; I can't wait to see part 10, yet I know I'll also be sad to see the series finally come to a close. At the fan forum, we've been discussing certain liberties the show has taken throughout the series. There are certainly those purists who LOVE to grouse, constantly nitpicking scenes and equipment ad-nauseam (one might call them the "Eeyores" of the group) but setting that aside, most people understand both the inevitability and the necessity of such changes, for myriad reasons. But there's one scene specifically that stands out to me in Part 9. Sledge's encounter with the "old Okinawan woman" (who asks him to end her pain by placing a bullet squarely between her eyes) is one that has come up on more than one occasion, and I think merits discussion. Would you be willing to discuss the motivations behind crafting that particular scene differently than Sledge recounts in his memoir? I'd love to crawl inside your head for a few moments on this one. Thanks! -Matt |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
JayLast
05/10/2010 |
I was interested in the same question that Matt posed about the scene with the Okinawan woman. I know liberties are usually taken, but for certain scenes such as this where the actual events say everything that needs to be said, I always wonder if the powers-that-be don't trust the audience enough to handle the truth, and that's why they feel they have to change it or make it more "Hollywood". Why I do agree that Rami is good in his role, I also wonder if he isn't somewhat like that in real life and therefore maybe playing an extension of himself. I think equally as impressive, if not more so, is the more subtle change in Sledge's character that Joe has portrayed. For crying out loud he even LOOKS older and more war-weary now than he did at the start. Now THAT is acting. Same with JBD. More important Bruce, what are we going to do next week when these weekly chat sessions are over? I'm going through withdrawal already. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
Bruce C. McKenna
![]() NM United States 05/10/2010 |
Jay and Matt -- re: Okinawan woman; It's a fair question to ask about any sequence in the Series. I originally wrote the sequence as it happened in the book. But as we (Producers in Australia) discussed it before we shot it, we realized that we hadn't done a good enough job of showing what distinguished Sledge from his peers and what permeates his entire book, and that is his deep sense of empathy. How could we show that Sledge never lost his sense of empathy? It's what saved him on Okinawa. So we decided to split the sequence to show him holding the woman as she dies, and then having the replacement shoot a young Japanese soldier afterward.
|
Login or Register to post a reply |
Bruce C. McKenna
![]() NM United States 05/10/2010 |
Jay -- Rami is nothing like Snafu in real life. THank God! He's charismatic, of course, but highly moral and very engaging. But I do agree with you about Joe. His transformation from innocent to killer is simply spectacular. I don't think a single war movie has ever done a better job of showing that transformation than what we see in Joe. He did a spectacular job. And as for those who grouse about it, they should know that the Sledge family is in in awe of his performance and think that he simply channeled Eugene. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
A Core
Australia 05/10/2010 |
Hi Bruce. This is a brilliant production. Everyone who worked on it should be rightly proud of what has been achieved. Just wondering why the A Core Military extra and the IJA were not credited at the end of any shows? From Day 1 of Boot Camp, to the final shot, they were there, helping out the actors, being professional and doing what was required of Capt Dye and his cadres. Any chance that they might get credited at the end of ep 10 or on the DVD when its released? Thanks. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
Bruce C. McKenna
![]() NM United States 05/11/2010 |
A Core -- I didn't realize that the extras were not credited at the end of shows. THey should be, as they were uniformly fantastic and highly professional -- as was the entire Australian crew. I don't know if they will get their due at the end of 10 or on the DVD, but I will certainly ask the powers that be. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
PBandJ
05/11/2010 |
Can't believe there is only one more new episode - have to thank you and the entire production team again for such an amazing piece of work. I've also been reading With the Old Breed like the reader above (as you recommended) but stopped short of the Okinawa sequence in the book. I knew a bit about Basilone before last week's episode so I wanted to go into the Okinawa scenes fresh. Can you talk a bit about writing the amazing character of Snafu? Rami Malek does such a phenomenal job - how much was on the page and how much of the charisma/weirdness did he add? It seems like he could have been a fairly minor character like in the book; did you beef up his role at all when you saw how good Malek was? |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
JP234
NV Canada 05/11/2010 |
Bruce, Great Great Great episode. Very Very powerful. Phenomenal job on the series. 2 quick questions, what was the reasoning for showing such a small amount of artillery barrages. Ive seen interviews with sledge where he states that the artillery barrages would go on non stop for days. Why such a low amount of shell fire scenes? Also, was there any talk of perhaps making Okinawa into two episodes? Taking the 2nd half of with the old breed and condensing it down to 50 some odd minutes seems a bit rushed. I feel Okinawa deserved 2 episodes for its sheer size and importance in history... it certainly seems like it deserved more screen time than the 1st marine divisions R&R in Melbourne, which received the same amount of attention in the show. I know condensing such a large portion of the book into one episode must have been a challenge and you and HBO did a fabulous job. Great episode Mr. Mckenna. Looking foreword to next weeks. Cheers. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
Bruce C. McKenna
![]() NM United States 05/11/2010 |
PBJ -- Rami's performance definitely shines. He was always going to be more than a minor character, but we made sure that we really delved into his relationship to Sledge in Ep 9, and partly that came about during production as we watched his dailies. But most of what you see was written before production. A lot of the weirdness is Rami's interpretation. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
Bruce C. McKenna
![]() NM United States 05/11/2010 |
JP -- We did originally have two Okinawa episodes. But if you are familiar with Sledge's book, you'll know that the first month was relatively unenventful compared to the next two. The invasion was somewhat uneventful. And we had already covered the "anticlimactic invasion" on Guadalcanal. It didn't make sense to ratchet down the intensity after Eight with an episode of K-3-5 in reserve (for the most part). Should we have had two full episodes of the kind of hell we portrayed in Nine? Perhaps, but we decided that would be too much for the audience (even nine by itself is almost too intense). We felt that we could get across the horror of Okinawa in fifty minutes. And I think we did a pretty damn good job. Do I wish we had eleven eps? Sure! As for "wasting" an hour on Melbourne, I clearly disagree. TP is a War movie, not a combat movie. War involves more than killing and mud and shells. It involves the intense feelings men have for women out of combat. It involves yearnings for home and hearth that is very very poignant. Leckie's moral descent wouldn't have worked without the hour in Melbourne (Stella dumping him). And you will see next episode how that episode pays off thematically. ANd just so you know, the Veterans certainly haven't complained about a break from combat in Three. Lastly, I'm glad you brought up the artillery. I had it in the original drafts of the scripts. Two reasons why it mostly got lost. One because we needed to hear the actors...and two, we screwed up in Post. I tried very hard to get a lot more artillery in...but my pleas fell on deaf ears. Such is life. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
JP234
NV Canada 05/11/2010 |
I guess that'd a fair point about the first month of okinawa. And I agree, the third episode was very important to the character of leckie and i liked the episode very much. I was merely stating that Okinawa is a more a significant section historically then Melbourne. It's a shame you guys lost the artillery scenes but the episode was still absolutely fantastic. Some of the most haunting scenes i think i've ever seen in a war film. Tremendous acting, writing, directing, and, well, everything. This episode is what put the series ahead of Band of Brothers. Congratulations! |
Login or Register to post a reply |
Bruce C. McKenna
![]() NM United States 05/12/2010 |
JP Thanks. I would heartily agree that Okinawa is far more significant historically than Melbourne. But our intentions were never to simply do a history lesson; but rather, to show the audience the impact of the war (combat and non combat) on our guys. Hope you enjoy the last ep! BCM |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
matt314159
05/12/2010 |
Bruce, one more very quick question, if I may: Throughout the episode, does SNAFU refer to Peck as "Boo," (an apparently sarcastic term of endearment), or is it "Boot'" (young recruit, wet behind the ears)? The latter seems to make more sense, however my ears never once heard Malek articulate a "T" at the end. Perhaps it's simply lost in the Louisiana bayou accent he affects so well? I'd be grateful if you could clarify! I've discussed this with a few people and opinions seem to be somewhat split. -Matt |
Login or Register to post a reply |
Bruce C. McKenna
![]() NM United States 05/12/2010 |
Matt -- It's the bayou accent. Boot...as in wet behind the ears, young recruit. Hope that settles it. BCM |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
mhenry
NY United States 05/12/2010 |
Bruce you are 100% correct about melbourne. It showed Basilone getting his medal and shipped out. Leckie's fall. And in real life Burgin married one of the austrailian girls. The point of the sex and stuff with a kid like Sidney too me, was showing how they left for war as kids and when they arrive in melbourne after the battle of guadcanal, they were now men. Alot of people loved the episode with John and Lena's relationship. That didnt have alot of combat but like melbourne was very pivotal to the story. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
Bruce C. McKenna
![]() NM United States 05/12/2010 |
MHenry -- Semper Fi! |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
PBandJ
05/13/2010 |
Bruce – I had a couple more questions while reading Sledge’s (disturbing and incredibly honest) book: What has been the response from Japanese Americans so far? Was there a lot of talk between the production team on how to portray the Japanese? Sledge seems to hate them even more in his book than what is shown on screen – which says a lot. When and why did you decide that The Pacific would be a ten hour film (I think you mentioned this before) instead of 10 distinct films like Band of Brothers? It seemed BoB almost had a different style and POV in every episode. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
mhenry
NY United States 05/13/2010 |
what i gathered to be the difference is that BOB is the story of Easy Company. The company as a whole, different missions,etc. The pacific is a journey of individuals. The journey is an evolution of each individual. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
Bruce C. McKenna
![]() NM United States 05/13/2010 |
PBJ I was asked by a couple of Japanese Journalists what I thought would be the response. I turned the question around and asked them. They both said that the older generation would watch it...and probably be accepting. THey were hoping that young Japanese would watch, if only to have their curiosity piqued about Japan's role in the war. As a culture, they have really never deeply examined the War, and they need to. We always knew that TP would always be more of an organic ten (originally 13!) hour movie, broken into ten parts, rather than the more distinctive episodes like Band. ANd this is because we wanted it to be more of an intense character journey for our main guys. It made it harder to structure, because not only does each episode have to carry the War, as well as the characters forward, but each episode also needs to stand on its own, with its own mini-theme. So the scripts were more integrated from the beginning. We tried to have fewer directors to keep the style and tone as consistent as possible. |
Login or Register to post a reply |
|
PattonEngineer
05/13/2010 |
Bruce, Thank you again for answering our questions, and I wanted to say how much I absolutely love the series (again). Having gone through 9 parts, we saw relatively little of Basilone, featured in only 2 episodes, whereas the other two leads are featured in 5 each (Leckie 1,3,4 and splitting 5 and 10(I think)), Sledge (6,7,9, splitting 5 and 10). I know you talked about 5 main characters when there were 13 episodes. Did you ever talk about just using Sledge and Leckie, and excluding Basilone's admittedly amazing story? Their stories seem to mesh a bit better together, even if some of that is dramatic license (their meeting, Phillips not being as close to Leckie as portrayed) and, thus, the handoff is a bit smoother. |
Login or Register to post a reply |

